Skip to main content

The Difference

  • Cricket is a huge obsession in India.
  • Movies are an equal craze in this country.

  • India has played 646 ODI matches in 23 years. That would make around 30 ODIs per year.
  • Indian cinema makes about 1200 movies a year, Bollywood alone accounting for 200.

  • Cricketers and cricket establishment make tons of money, with zero professionalism.
  • Movie stars and producers earn billions making pseudo-emotional NRI Indianism garbage.

  • Half of the major brand ambassadors are cricketers.
  • The rest are film stars.

  • Our cricket is rarely world-class.
  • Our movies in general are nothing to write home about.

  • For all you time conscious people, a person watching all the India ODIs in one year spends 30*7=210 hours on cricket.
  • An average man in India watches at least one movie a week (either in cinema halls or television), which comes to 52*3=156 hours a year.

  • India had won the 1983 World Cup. There were a few other achievements like reaching finals of 2003 World Cup, beating Australia in a test series in Australia. Apart from that, our performance has been consistently inconsistent.
  • Indian movies have been nominated only 3 times in best films category in the history of Oscars, not once winning. I will be surprised if the statistics differs at other international awards.

  • One out of every three persons I talk to wants cricket to be banned in India, as if banning cricket for 10 years would make India the world beaters by 2017.
  • I am yet to meet a person who wants movies to be banned in India.

Why the difference? :)
Labels:

Comments

krupa said…
Cricket is very personal to Indians.It hurts them to see the team lose.
Movies on the other hand..are used my most Indians to escape from their lives.They dont want existentialism.
Bad movie-you can forget about it(unless ofcourse its as bad as Fanaa)...Cricket hurts your pride.see?
May 05, 2007 3:15 AM
Anonymous said…
long time back, i was a cricket addict. at the trn of this millennium, realised how much precious time i have lost. have stopped watching and following the game ever since.

liked this post. very well written.

know what? next world cup ICC can save a lot of money by having just the opening ceremony, photo session and then presenting the WC to Australia. say what?

happy blogging

regards
bellur

ps: you have been blogrolled.
May 09, 2007 4:53 PM
parijata said…
I loved this post.
And I am one person who wants movie-making also to be banned in India. The movies churned out are of such bad quality that they are an insult to one's intelligence.

All the movie-makers should be made to take a break, and should be given at least basic lessons in Literature, Sociology and a couple of other subjects. (And poojaris should take a break and learn basic Sanskrit...) However, I guess that is too much to expect of them.
August 01, 2007 10:46 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Limitations Of Human Imagination

I watched the movie "The Abyss" yesterday. Unadulterated hollywood alien-sci-fi garbage. Pseudo-emotions mixed with american-arrogance, so much crap that it would have given Karan Johar some serious inferiority complex. But, this made me think why so many alien stories are so similar. Lets come to the assumptions in the alien movies: 1) Aliens always love to make contact with the humans (If I were an alien, I would try to make contact with crocodiles - much more interesting, right?) 2) Aliens are generally much more intelligent than humans (Its hard to beat the dumbness of humans - probably aliens don't watch Big Boss! Also, since 'they' contact us by reaching 'our' planet, they must be better than us!) 3) Aliens by default understand or learn English (by intercepting the cerebral signals and interpreting with the aural waves and decoding to hexadecimal system - you will be given some such nonsense by the story writers) If you tell the aliens "howdy...
4 comments
Read more

Tell me your mail id and I will tell who you are

You might have known people telling personality traits based on sun signs, moon signs, date of birth, year of birth (oh yes, its a chinese one). I have seen personality tests based on color preferences, answers to particular questions etc. I even had a DOS application which told about your qualities based on the way you built a house! But, I always wondered why people never analyzed based on people's mail ids. Here is an honest attempt at a never-done-before task. Disclaimer : This analysis is obviously prejudiced and has no scientific explanation. Any hurt, sadness or anger caused to anyone is purely accidental and simply unavoidable! If your primary mail is Yahoo... You love stability. You take calculated risks in life. You dont believe in sudden changes, and you think that hard work is the only way to success. You balance your personal life and career very well. The only regret you have is that people dont give enough credit for wha...
13 comments
Read more

Ringtones

Why is it that most people don't keep their mobiles in silent mode, in general and particularly in meetings, movie halls, theaters and concerts? Why is it that people who hate silent mode, don't ever use "Increasing ring" feature? Why do such people use very loud ring tones? Why is it that most people use a very common ring tone and it takes them eternity to pick calls? (Yes, they don't even realize that its their mobile that is ringing!) Why is it that people with the most irritating ring tones are the ones who get calls very regularly? Why is it that most of the ring tones are monotonic? (Don't you think polyphonic ring tones are so less irritating on the ears?) Why is it that people so frequently use the default Nokia monotonic ring tone or a badly played version of Malgudi Days? Why have I never heard a nice polyphonic ring tone of Hotel California or Pulp Fiction theme or something? Why?
2 comments
Read more